- Many residents and community groups advocate for developing affordable housing on city-owned downtown parking lots to address housing shortages, support local workers, and maintain community vibrancy. Supporters emphasize the importance of deep affordability, utilizing public land for maximum benefit, and integrating supportive housing for individuals with disabilities.
- Opponents raise issues about parking capacity, downtown character, traffic, and potential negative impacts on small businesses and residents, particularly seniors and disabled. Some suggest alternative sites like the Civic Center and caution against high-rise structures or rapid development that may disrupt community character or delay progress.
- Multiple RFQ submissions from developers demonstrate interest in building mixed-use, affordable housing with creative parking solutions. There is a call for careful selection of experienced, mission-driven developers to ensure long-term affordability, tenant stability, and community integration. Some urge community engagement and consideration of alternative sites to mitigate opposition.
- Residents highlight issues such as noise pollution from train horns, the need for a Quiet Zone, and traffic impacts. There are strong recommendations to retain funding and support for Quiet Zone implementation, along with suggestions for minimizing disruption during construction, improving parking, and preserving local aesthetics.
- Widespread community voices support the housing initiatives, emphasizing the importance of inclusive, affordable options for teachers, workers, families, and seniors. Counter to vocal opposition, many residents consider the initiatives essential for fostering equity, reducing long commutes, and maintaining downtown vitality.
- Some community members propose exploring additional sites like the Civic Center or SRI property, advocating for dual-track development strategies to avoid delays and legal issues. There are suggestions for replacing downtown parking with multi-level or underground solutions, and for incorporating community support facilities for vulnerable populations.
- Residents reference state mandates, housing law, and comparisons with neighboring cities like Mountain View. Calls for a balanced approach that prioritizes deeply affordable units, streamlines development, and avoids costly legal challenges or ballot measures to ensure timely, responsible housing growth.
- Numerous residents and community groups advocate for converting downtown parking lots into affordable housing to address the housing crisis, foster downtown vibrancy, and accommodate essential workers, with many emphasizing the importance of including deeply affordable units and leveraging city land efficiently.
- Some community members oppose housing projects citing concerns over parking shortages, traffic, community character, potential crime, and the impact on downtown businesses. Several call for alternative locations like the Civic Center sites and emphasize preserving the town’s aesthetic and neighborhood integrity.
- Many residents highlight the need for adequate parking solutions, suggesting multi-story or underground structures, and express worries about the feasibility of replacing parking with new developments, urging careful planning and exploration of alternative sites to ensure sufficient parking.
- Community members commend RFQ submissions from developers proposing mixed-use, deeply affordable housing, and emphasize the importance of selecting experienced, mission-driven developers to ensure project success and sustainability.
- Residents advocate for maintaining projects like the Quiet Zone to reduce train horn noise, emphasizing its health and quality of life benefits, and urge the city to keep funding for these projects despite budget considerations.
- Some suggest prioritizing civic center sites over downtown parking lots to meet housing mandates efficiently, and propose dual strategies to avoid delays, lawsuits, and community opposition, advocating for flexible planning.
- Residents share personal stories of housing hardship, the importance of inclusive community planning, and the need for equitable development that supports diverse income levels, essential workers, and long-term residents to preserve a vibrant, accessible Menlo Park.
- Multiple messages focus on housing-related issues, including community meetings on the 80 Willow mega-tower proposal, concerns about large homes replacing traditional single-story residences, and discussions on affordable housing initiatives supported by the city, such as grants and community programs.
- Community members express frustrations about new developments, especially large homes replacing small houses, with concerns about neighborhood character, privacy, and inadequate community engagement during construction planning.
- Several inputs highlight the importance of maintaining and expanding affordable housing, citing ongoing funding for programs like HIP Housing and emphasizing the need for long-term leases and supportive services for low-income residents.
- Residents call for more inclusive community involvement in development plans, updates on downtown revitalization, and improvements to public spaces to foster a vibrant, connected neighborhood.
- Concerns are raised about city planning decisions, staff shortages, and the need for strategic updates to zoning and retail policies to support housing growth and downtown economic vitality.
- Multiple residents and stakeholders express concern about the lack of transparency regarding RFQ responses for affordable housing, requesting access to documents, and emphasizing the need for community involvement in decisions impacting housing location and development.
- Community members oppose using downtown parking lots and certain city sites for housing, suggesting alternative locations such as USGS or vacant properties, and highlight petitions with significant opposition to current housing site proposals.
- Business owners and residents voice concerns about the potential negative effects of housing developments, including parking shortages, disruption of downtown life, and preservation of community character, advocating for balanced and alternative solutions.
- There is discussion about strategic placement of affordable housing, with some proposing USGS as a location, and emphasizing the importance of fair processes, public votes, and transparency in planning efforts.
- The community is invited to informational sessions and discussions regarding housing proposals, with calls for considering public input, understanding existing legal challenges, and exploring better site options.
- Resident concerns include the effects of ongoing development, the need for proper community input, and the importance of preserving local character and supporting existing infrastructure, particularly parking and community spaces.
- Residents highlight issues at local amenities like the Belle Haven Senior Center, the library, and Menlo Swim and Sport, calling for improvements, proper maintenance, and transparency in addressing ongoing problems and preserving community assets.
- Many residents and business owners support redevelopment plans, particularly advocating for affordable housing on downtown parking lots to revitalize the area and address housing shortages. Opponents argue the scale is too large, impacts neighborhood character, and threatens local businesses, especially retail spaces, citing potential negative effects on traffic, parking, and downtown vibrancy.
- Several residents and organizations suggest considering other city-owned sites such as Civic Center parking lots and open spaces, which are viewed as more appropriate for housing projects. There is concern about focusing solely on downtown parking lots, which face opposition and potential economic consequences.
- Business owners express fears that housing plans on parking lots and downtown disruptions are causing retail closures and relocating stores, like Ruby LivingDesign and Coffeebar. They highlight that lack of parking and construction disturbances threaten downtown's vitality and the local economy.
- Residents and stakeholders emphasize the need for safe access points, including support for a second entrance to residential projects such as 320 Sheridan Drive and Flood Park developments, to improve safety, traffic flow, and emergency access. There are also concerns about traffic congestion, especially on major roads like Bay Road and VanBuren.
- The majority of community members support affordable housing initiatives, particularly near transit and central locations like downtown. Several express willingness to assist and advocate for supportive development that balances housing needs with community character and infrastructure capacity.
-
-
1
