- Multiple community meetings and informational sessions are scheduled regarding local development projects, including the 80 Willow mega-tower proposal and the SRI / Parkline Master Plan, emphasizing transparency and public input. A bike rack survey was conducted to assess needs around the city, with efforts to include diverse community perspectives. Concerns about infrastructure capacity, environmental impacts, and cross-jurisdictional effects are highlighted for the EIR process to ensure thorough review of the project's regional implications and infrastructure support systems, such as utilities and emergency services.
- Environmental review process amendments are advocated to ensure rigorous, transparent assessments of the 80 Willow project, especially regarding biological resources, creek setbacks, and regional impacts. The Sierra Club emphasizes the importance of independent peer reviews, verified environmental data, and comprehensive analysis of jobs-housing balance, displacement, and infrastructure capacity to mitigate environmental and ecological risks.
- Efforts to maintain and support affordable housing are discussed, including funding for nonprofit organizations like HIP Housing, which provides housing resources for low-income families, seniors, and individuals working in Menlo Park. The importance of long-term lease support for community institutions such as the cooperative nursery school is emphasized to preserve community cohesion and access for families, especially amid rising housing costs and community development pressures.
- Updates and concerns are raised regarding downtown revitalization, retail use clauses, and city staffing vacancies affecting economic development. Recommendations include expanding retail use flexibility (such as gyms and fitness centers) to address vacancies and improve economic vitality, alongside advocating for filling key city staff roles to support ongoing infrastructure and community projects.
- Multiple residents and local business owners express significant concerns regarding the city's handling of public safety, infrastructure, enforcement, and development projects. Issues include opposition to construction and development on city-owned parking lots and private properties, safety hazards along Willow Road and O'Brien Drive, threats to small businesses from nearby construction, and inadequate emergency and safety planning, particularly at the Belle Haven Community Campus. Residents cite violations of California building codes, lack of transparency in developer selections, misuse or mismanagement of city facilities like the library, and failure to implement traffic safety measures. Several petitions and community petitions urge the city to prioritize public safety, transparency, and community input, emphasizing the importance of maintaining essential public services, accessible infrastructure, and safeguarding human lives in development and safety planning.
- Community members raise concerns about overdevelopment and traffic safety at proposed projects like 80 Willow Road and 320 Sheridan Drive, urging the city to require environmental impact reports and safer access routes, including secondary entrances. Several residents emphasize the importance of enhancing traffic safety, environmental protections, and infrastructure improvements such as second access roads, particularly to ensure emergency safety and reduce congestion. There is also advocacy for maintaining adequate parking, protecting natural resources, and supporting affordable housing through careful planning and transparent processes.
- Residents advocate for reopening Santa Cruz Avenue to enhance traffic flow, accessibility, and support local businesses, emphasizing the importance of pedestrian-friendly streets and community engagement in street redesigns.
- Community members request streets like Woodland Ave be resurfaced with adherence to Menlo Park Walkway Standards for sidewalks and bike lanes, addressing hazardous conditions for pedestrians and cyclists and integrating Complete Streets principles.
- Requests for interviews on flood infrastructure improvements and urgent efforts to assist homeless individuals emphasize need for effective public utility management and social services in public works context.
- Community voices support for the Transportation Master Plan, Vision Zero, and street calming measures, advocating for street redesigns that prioritize pedestrians, cyclists, and transit, especially on streets like Woodland Ave.
- Opposition to certain development projects and parking regulations that threaten local businesses, residents, or vulnerable groups is expressed, emphasizing the importance of community-focused infrastructure planning and equitable solutions.
- Residents call for clear communication, follow-up procedures for service requests, and community involvement in planning decisions related to streets, zoning, and infrastructure improvements.
- Several residents and officials, including attorney Michael DeMoss, advocate for court challenges against California's housing laws, claiming they are improperly imposed on cities like Menlo Park and threaten local development plans, especially concerning parking lots.
- Multiple community members, property owners, and business owners oppose converting downtown parking lots into housing, citing concerns about loss of essential parking, impact on local businesses, community character, and traffic. Many call for thorough impact studies and exploration of alternative sites.
- Residents express worry over the potential strain on infrastructure, parking shortages, increased traffic, and disruption to the small-town vibe. Suggestions include building community amenities like parks and sports fields, and developing plans with urban design input.
- Community members criticize insufficient outreach, perceived bias in surveys, and lack of disclosure about legal and land considerations related to proposed developments, urging for more transparency, public access, and community involvement.
- Business owners highlight the importance of parking for their operations, warning that loss of parking will harm businesses and the local economy. They request alternative locations for housing and proper parking replacement solutions.
- Residents appreciate transit improvements such as the Menlo Shuttle but remain concerned about traffic congestion, parking availability, and the ability for people with mobility challenges to access downtown services during construction or after development.
- Citizens question the legality of designating parking lots as surplus land, the sufficiency of impact studies, and whether proper legal processes are being followed. Some suggest tearing down existing structures temporarily to assess feasibility.
- Suggestions include using underutilized city-owned sites like Civic Center or Flood Park for affordable housing, building multi-story parking garages, and implementing community amenities, while preserving downtown's character.
- Widespread opposition includes petitions exceeding 2,500 signatures, warnings of legal action, and protests, emphasizing the community’s desire to preserve parking and local businesses, and to reject the proposed development locations.
- Some residents advocate for human-centered design, efficient land use, and minimizing parking in favor of walkable, transit-accessible neighborhoods that improve community vitality, with references to urban development literature.
1
