Publique un mensaje aquí para que lo lean los vecinos. Envíe un correo electrónico a todo el Ayuntamiento para obtener una respuesta más rápida. Los correos electrónicos se publicarán aquí automáticamente y serán comentarios públicos oficiales.
Troy and Mindy, After 2.5 weeks, this is the response we have received regarding our third submission of the SB9 Final Parcel Map. A third-round review of an SB9 map should not require three weeks, yet the City has now “determined” that comments will not be provided until *12/8/25*. This 3rd r...
Azalea--Ebby has been copied on all emails in the past 2 months and ignored us. There is nothing else to discuss we made it very clear what needs to happen - Approval of our Maylar map. Edress is completely clueless calling our title company asking what we have two signatures on the Final Map whe...
Troy and Mindy, There is no response from the city of MP PW on our final map/Mylar so it can be routed for signatures. Clueless and still repeatedly asking dumb irrelevant questions. Those are the people that prevent delivery of housing units from Menlo Park City Council to the city manager d...
Matt, This email was sent to you 8 days ago. This is a SB9 project that you, PW and entire staff of city of MP screwed it up with all your nonsense excuses at applicants expense. We need ANSWERS and not every 2 weeks...I am copying HCD investigator Troy Andres that is assigned to this case. Resp...
*Edress,* This is a reminder that approval of the Mylar map, so it can be routed for signatures, is a *3–4 business day* process. Our submittal was made on *11/17/25*, and our approval is due by tomorrow. I understand from the escrow company (First American Title) that you stated you had “n...
Edress, Ninety percent of your comments on the 9/22/25 resubmission were irrelevant, as detailed in the attached response. No changes were required for the majority of the 9/22/25 parcel map submission. The applicant has resubmitted the Final Parcel Map and supporting documents and re-explana...
*Submitted pursuant to California Government Code §§ 65589.5 (Housing Accountability Act) and § 65852.21 (SB9 Ministerial Approval Requirement) for State Review and Enforcement* ------------------------------ *To Whom It May Concern,* This is a formal complaint regarding the City of Menlo P...
Dear City Council Members and City Manager, This is a complaint regarding *Edress **Rangeen *a Associate Engineer for city of Menlo Park. His (or the City’s 3rd party consultant’s) review comments on our *SB9 two-lot subdivision* are *irrelevant*—we were asked for hydrology calculations, which...
Connor - Daniel from L&Braze submitted this AM all files to the link you provided. Please confirm receipt. For the record: Your MP process is not following SB9 process as far as requiring a final parcel map and signed 3 year affidavit with the SB9 application when that creates a clear issue sinc...
